ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

定性内容分析×话语分析×主题分析×
领域质性研究质性研究质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19801989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)2006
提出者Klaus Krippendorff; refined by Margrit SchreierNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret WetherellVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
类型MethodMethodMethod
开创性文献Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications. link ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
别名Content Analysis, Categorical Content AnalysisDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive AnalysisTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
相关223
摘要Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) is a systematic, inductive method for analyzing textual or visual data by identifying and categorizing meaning units into content categories. Developed and formalized by Klaus Krippendorff (1980), QCA can be purely qualitative (inductive, exploratory) or combined with quantitative counting; it analyzes manifest content (explicit, surface meanings) and latent content (underlying, interpretive meanings).Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Qualitative Content Analysis · Discourse Analysis · Thematic Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare