ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

内容分析×Matched-Guise Technique×
领域质性语言学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 20181960
提出者Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications researchWallace Lambert and colleagues
类型Qualitative / mixed-method research techniqueIndirect experimental measure of language attitudes
开创性文献Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 44–51. DOI ↗
别名İçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysisMatched Guise Test, Matched-Guise Experiment, Language Attitude Matched Guise
相关52
摘要Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.The matched-guise technique is an indirect experimental method for measuring attitudes toward languages, dialects, and accents. Developed by Wallace Lambert and colleagues in 1960, it has the same bilingual or bidialectal speaker record the same passage in two or more language varieties ('guises'); listeners, believing they are hearing different speakers, rate each recording on personality and status traits. Because the voice, content, and delivery are held constant, any differences in the ratings can be attributed to listeners' attitudes toward the variety itself.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Content Analysis · Matched-Guise Technique. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare