ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

恒定比较法×现象学×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1967Early 20th century (Husserl ~1900–1913; Heidegger ~1927)
提出者Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. StraussEdmund Husserl (transcendental); Martin Heidegger (hermeneutic)
类型Qualitative research methodQualitative research approach
开创性文献Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803957466
别名CCM, constant comparison, constant comparative analysis, comparative constant analysisFenomenoloji, phenomenological inquiry, phenomenological analysis
相关66
摘要The Constant Comparative Method (CCM) is a systematic qualitative analysis procedure in which every newly coded incident is immediately compared with all previously coded incidents in the same category. Introduced by Glaser and Strauss in their 1967 grounded theory framework, CCM drives theory development by cycling continuously between data collection and analysis, progressively refining categories until theoretical saturation is reached. Though closely associated with grounded theory, the method has been widely adopted as a stand-alone analytic strategy across qualitative traditions.Phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that investigates how participants live through and make sense of a specific experience. Rooted in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl and extended by Martin Heidegger, it aims to reveal the essential structures of lived experience rather than to measure or predict outcomes. The two most widely applied variants are Husserl's transcendental phenomenology, which seeks universal essences, and Heidegger's hermeneutic phenomenology, which emphasises interpretation within context.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Constant Comparative Method · Phenomenology. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare