ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

恒定比较法×叙事分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19671967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook)
提出者Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. StraussCatherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967)
类型Qualitative research methodQualitative interpretive method
开创性文献Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗
别名CCM, constant comparison, constant comparative analysis, comparative constant analysisnarrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis)
相关66
摘要The Constant Comparative Method (CCM) is a systematic qualitative analysis procedure in which every newly coded incident is immediately compared with all previously coded incidents in the same category. Introduced by Glaser and Strauss in their 1967 grounded theory framework, CCM drives theory development by cycling continuously between data collection and analysis, progressively refining categories until theoretical saturation is reached. Though closely associated with grounded theory, the method has been widely adopted as a stand-alone analytic strategy across qualitative traditions.Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Constant Comparative Method · Narrative Analysis. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare