ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

验证性因子分析(CFA)×聚合效度×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份19691959
提出者Karl Gustav JöreskogDonald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
类型Hypothesis-testing latent variable modelValidity evidence / construct validation
开创性文献Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
别名CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysisconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
相关44
摘要Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Confirmatory factor analysis · Convergent Validity. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare