方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 并发转型混合方法× | 转型混合方法设计× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究设计 | 研究设计 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s (formalized ~2007–2009) | 2003–2009 |
| 提出者 | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| 类型 | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| 别名 | concurrent transformative design, simultaneous transformative mixed methods, parallel transformative design, transformative concurrent design | transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Concurrent transformative mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, guided by a transformative theoretical lens — such as feminist, critical race, disability, or indigenous frameworks — that foregrounds equity, power, and social change. The design gives either strand equal or unequal priority, but both strands are explicitly shaped by the transformative worldview. Findings are merged or compared to generate actionable insights that advocate for marginalized communities. | Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|