ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Concept Mapping Assessment×Rubric Development×
领域EducationEducation
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19842007
提出者Joseph Novak & D. Bob Gowin; assessment use developed by Ruiz-Primo & ShavelsonPerformance-assessment tradition (Andrade; Arter & McTighe; Jonsson & Svingby synthesis)
类型Graphical assessment of the structure and connectedness of knowledgeSystematic design of criterion-based scoring guides for performance
开创性文献Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521319263Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. DOI ↗
别名Concept Map Assessment, Knowledge Structure Mapping, Concept Map Scoring, Novakian Concept MappingScoring Rubric Design, Analytic and Holistic Rubrics, Performance Scoring Guides, Rubric Construction
相关44
摘要Concept mapping assessment uses student-generated diagrams of concepts and their relationships to evaluate the structure of knowledge, not just its quantity. A concept map represents ideas as labeled nodes connected by labeled links that form meaningful propositions, often arranged hierarchically with cross-links between branches. Developed from Novak and Gowin's work on meaningful learning and formalized as an assessment tool by Ruiz-Primo and Shavelson, it reveals how well a learner has organized and integrated a domain, exposing connections and misconceptions a multiple-choice test would miss.Rubric development is the systematic design of criterion-referenced scoring guides for judging complex performance such as writing, projects, presentations, and problem solving. A rubric specifies the dimensions on which work is evaluated and describes, in ordered levels, what each degree of quality looks like. Done well — as the syntheses by Andrade and by Jonsson and Svingby show — rubrics make scoring more reliable and transparent, clarify expectations for students, and turn assessment into a tool for learning rather than merely a verdict.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Concept Mapping Assessment · Rubric Development. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare