方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 计算机化自适应测验的聚合效度× | 聚合效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1989–2000 | 1959 |
| 提出者≠ | Samuel Messick (validity framework); Wainer and colleagues (CAT context) | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| 类型 | Validity evidence / construct validation | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| 开创性文献≠ | Wainer, H. (Ed.). (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805835113 | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | CAT convergent validity, adaptive test construct validation, CAT validity evidence, convergent validity in CAT | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Convergent validity assessment for computerized adaptive tests (CATs) examines whether the ability or trait estimates produced by an adaptive algorithm correlate substantially with scores from other measures of the same construct. Because each examinee receives a different subset of items in a CAT, demonstrating that the resulting scores still converge with theoretically related external measures is a critical step in establishing construct validity evidence. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|