方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 计算机化自适应测试（CAT）中的内容效度× | 内容效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1975 / 1980 | 1975 |
| 提出者≠ | Lawshe (content validity); Lord & Weiss (CAT framework) | C. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurement |
| 类型≠ | Validity evaluation / test design | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure |
| 开创性文献 | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ |
| 别名 | CAT content validity, adaptive item bank content coverage, content balancing in CAT, CAT blueprint validity | content-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validation |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Content validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) ensures that an adaptively administered assessment adequately samples the intended content domain despite delivering only a subset of items to each examinee. It integrates classical content validity methods with CAT-specific item bank design and content balancing algorithms to guarantee representative domain coverage at both the item bank and the individual test level. | Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|