方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较视觉分析× | 比较话语分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1986–2001 (systematic codification in social research) | 1980s–1990s (established as comparative practice through the 1990s) |
| 提出者≠ | Gillian Rose (systematic visual methods); John Collier Jr. (visual anthropology) | Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research approach |
| 开创性文献≠ | Rose, G. (2016). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1473942028 | Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman. ISBN: 978-0582219526 |
| 别名 | cross-case visual analysis, comparative image analysis, comparative visual methods, CVA | CDA comparative, cross-context discourse analysis, comparative text analysis, multi-site discourse analysis |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative Visual Analysis is a qualitative research design that systematically examines and compares visual materials — photographs, videos, artworks, advertisements, or digital images — across two or more cases, groups, time points, or contexts. By applying a consistent analytical framework to multiple visual corpora, the approach reveals similarities, differences, and patterns that would remain invisible when studying a single set of images alone. | Comparative discourse analysis examines how language constructs meaning, identity, and power by systematically contrasting texts or speech acts drawn from at least two distinct contexts, groups, time periods, or institutions. By holding analytical categories constant across cases, it reveals how discursive patterns diverge or converge, producing insights that single-context discourse analysis cannot generate. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|