方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较类型学分析× | 类型学分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 田野方法 | 田野方法 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | Late 19th–early 20th century (formalized across disciplines) | Late 19th century (Montelius ~1885); extended broadly through 20th century |
| 提出者≠ | Various (Linnaeus in biology; Franz Boas, Edward Sapir in anthropology/linguistics; Gordon Childe in archaeology) | Oscar Montelius (seriation/typology in archaeology); formalized across disciplines through 19th–20th c. comparative humanities |
| 类型≠ | Comparative qualitative/analytical method | Classificatory / interpretive method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226114330 | McKern, W. C. (1939). The Midwestern Taxonomic Method as an aid to archaeological culture study. American Antiquity, 4(4), 301–313. link ↗ |
| 别名 | cross-typological comparison, typological comparative method, comparative typology, CTA | typology construction, artifact typology, type analysis, classificatory typology |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative typological analysis is a systematic method for classifying phenomena into types and then examining how those types differ, overlap, or share structural features across multiple cases, contexts, or cultures. Widely applied in linguistics, archaeology, law, and the social sciences, it moves beyond single-case typology by placing type systems in dialogue with one another to identify cross-cutting patterns, universals, or culturally specific configurations. | Typological analysis is a systematic method for grouping objects, texts, legal categories, or social phenomena into defined types based on shared attributes. Originating in archaeology and linguistics, it is now widely applied across the humanities and social sciences to impose analytical order on diverse corpora, trace historical change, and enable meaningful comparison across cases or cultures. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|