方法对比

	比较类型学分析	比较判例法分析
领域	田野方法	田野方法
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	Late 19th–early 20th century (formalized across disciplines)	Late 19th–20th century (systematic comparative law from ~1900; case-focused comparative methodology consolidated ~1970s–1990s)
提出者	Various (Linnaeus in biology; Franz Boas, Edward Sapir in anthropology/linguistics; Gordon Childe in archaeology)	Comparative law tradition (Zweigert, Kötz, MacCormick, Summers and others)
类型	Comparative qualitative/analytical method	Qualitative legal research method
开创性文献	Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226114330	MacCormick, D. N., & Summers, R. S. (Eds.). (1991). Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study. Dartmouth. ISBN: 978-1855210264
别名	cross-typological comparison, typological comparative method, comparative typology, CTA	cross-jurisdictional case analysis, comparative judicial analysis, transnational case law comparison, CCLA
相关	5	6
摘要	Comparative typological analysis is a systematic method for classifying phenomena into types and then examining how those types differ, overlap, or share structural features across multiple cases, contexts, or cultures. Widely applied in linguistics, archaeology, law, and the social sciences, it moves beyond single-case typology by placing type systems in dialogue with one another to identify cross-cutting patterns, universals, or culturally specific configurations.	Comparative case law analysis is a qualitative legal research method that systematically examines and contrasts judicial decisions from two or more legal systems or jurisdictions. By placing rulings side by side, the method identifies convergences, divergences, and the underlying legal reasoning that shapes how courts address similar legal questions across different national or regional contexts.