方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较主题分析× | 比较案例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s (as an explicit comparative variant of thematic analysis) | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提出者≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis foundation); comparative extension developed in applied policy and cross-cultural qualitative research traditions | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative comparative analytical strategy | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 别名 | cross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, multi-group thematic analysis, comparative qualitative thematic analysis | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative Thematic Analysis applies the structured procedures of thematic analysis across two or more distinct groups, sites, or time points, with the explicit aim of identifying both shared patterns and meaningful differences. Rather than producing a single composite account of experience, it yields a layered analysis that maps where themes converge and diverge across comparison units — making it especially valuable for policy-relevant, cross-cultural, or multi-site qualitative studies. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|