方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较性斯特劳斯扎根理论× | 主题分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1967 (discovery); systematic Straussian procedures codified 1990/1998 | 2006 |
| 提出者≠ | Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (Straussian GT); comparative extension built on Glaser & Strauss (1967) | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803959408 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | Strauss-Corbin comparative GT, comparative systematic grounded theory, multi-site Straussian GT, comparative grounded theory (Straussian) | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative Straussian Grounded Theory applies the systematic open–axial–selective coding framework of Strauss and Corbin across two or more purposively selected contexts, groups, or sites to generate theory that explains both within-context processes and cross-context variation. The constant comparative method — the analytic engine first described by Glaser and Strauss (1967) — is elevated to a deliberate design-level strategy, allowing researchers to build mid-range theory that accounts for how social processes unfold differently under varying conditions. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|