ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

比较定性内容分析×比较话语分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1983 (Mayring's QCA foundation); comparative adaptations prominent from 2000s onward1980s–1990s (established as comparative practice through the 1990s)
提出者Philipp Mayring (qualitative content analysis); comparative application developed across communication, policy, and social science researchNorman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk
类型Qualitative research design and analysis strategyQualitative comparative research approach
开创性文献Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029201Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman. ISBN: 978-0582219526
别名comparative QCA, cross-case qualitative content analysis, multi-context qualitative content analysis, comparative interpretive content analysisCDA comparative, cross-context discourse analysis, comparative text analysis, multi-site discourse analysis
相关45
摘要Comparative qualitative content analysis (comparative QCA) applies a systematic, category-driven reading of texts or documents across two or more cases, groups, time periods, or cultural contexts, with the explicit goal of identifying similarities, differences, and patterns that emerge from the comparison. It combines the interpretive rigour of qualitative content analysis with a structured comparative logic, making it valuable for cross-national policy research, media studies, and any inquiry that requires principled comparison of meaning across contexts.Comparative discourse analysis examines how language constructs meaning, identity, and power by systematically contrasting texts or speech acts drawn from at least two distinct contexts, groups, time periods, or institutions. By holding analytical categories constant across cases, it reveals how discursive patterns diverge or converge, producing insights that single-context discourse analysis cannot generate.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Comparative Qualitative content analysis · Comparative Discourse Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare