ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

比较现象学×主题分析×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Late 20th century (comparative applications prominent from the 1980s–1990s onward)2006
提出者Edmund Husserl (foundational); systematised in comparative application by Amedeo Giorgi, Max van Manen, and othersVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
类型Qualitative comparative research designMethod
开创性文献van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
别名cross-group phenomenology, multi-group phenomenological study, comparative phenomenological inquiry, contrastive phenomenologyTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
相关43
摘要Comparative phenomenology applies phenomenological inquiry to two or more distinct groups, cultures, or contexts, explicitly contrasting how each group lives through and makes meaning of a shared phenomenon. Rather than describing a single unified essence, it reveals both common structures and meaningful differences in lived experience across comparison units. The approach is grounded in Husserlian and hermeneutic phenomenology but extends the standard single-group design into a structured cross-group analysis.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Comparative phenomenology · Thematic Analysis. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare