方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较口述史× | 口述史× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1970s–1990s (oral history discipline; comparative application developed through 1990s) | 1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology |
| 提出者≠ | Alessandro Portelli, Paul Thompson (oral history tradition); comparative design adapted from cross-cultural qualitative research | Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Portelli, A. (1991). The Death of Luigi Trastulli and Other Stories: Form and Meaning in Oral History. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404997 | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957 |
| 别名 | comparative oral history, cross-group oral history, comparative oral testimony, multi-site oral history | life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative oral history collects and systematically compares first-person spoken testimonies from two or more distinct groups, communities, or historical contexts. The method blends the interpretive depth of oral history — privileging personal memory and narrative — with the analytical logic of comparative design, enabling researchers to identify both shared patterns and meaningful differences across the groups under study. | Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|