ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

比较法分析×法律内容分析×
领域田野方法田野方法
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Late 19th century; formalised 19001940s–1970s (applied systematically to legal texts)
提出者Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (early conceptualisation); Raymond Saleilles and Édouard Lambert (modern discipline, 1900 Paris Congress)Interdisciplinary; foundational content analysis by Harold Lasswell (1940s); applied to legal texts by empirical legal scholars from the 1970s onward
类型Qualitative legal research methodSystematic qualitative-quantitative text analysis
开创性文献Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd ed., T. Weir, Trans.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198268598Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761915454
别名comparative law, legal comparison, comparative jurisprudence, CLALCA, legal text analysis, jurimetric content analysis, statutory content analysis
相关66
摘要Comparative legal analysis is a structured research method that examines how two or more legal systems — whether national, regional, or supranational — address a common legal problem. By placing rules, doctrines, and judicial decisions side by side, researchers identify convergences, divergences, and the underlying societal, historical, and political forces that shape legal solutions. The method is foundational to law reform, harmonisation efforts, treaty drafting, and academic legal scholarship.Legal content analysis applies the systematic procedures of content analysis to legal texts — statutes, regulations, judicial opinions, treaties, and legal commentaries — in order to identify patterns, themes, and trends across a corpus of legal material. It bridges qualitative legal scholarship and quantitative social-science methods, enabling researchers to draw reproducible, evidence-based conclusions about how law is written, applied, or has changed over time.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Comparative Legal Analysis · Legal Content Analysis. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare