方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Comparative Historical Archival Research× | 比较案例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 田野方法 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | Late 19th century (archival foundations); mid-20th century (comparative systematic application) | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提出者≠ | Leopold von Ranke (archival history); Theda Skocpol, Barrington Moore (comparative-historical synthesis) | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521294997 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 别名 | comparative-historical analysis, cross-national archival research, comparative archival history, CHAR | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative historical archival research combines systematic examination of primary archival sources across two or more historical cases — nations, regions, institutions, or time periods — to identify causal patterns, structural similarities, and divergences that single-case histories cannot reveal. It is the method of choice when researchers want to explain why similar or different outcomes emerged across distinct historical contexts using documentary evidence. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|