方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较扎根理论× | 建构主义扎根理论× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward | 2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967) |
| 提出者≠ | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars | Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967) |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| 别名 | cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis | CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies. | Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|