方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较扎根理论× | 比较人种志× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) |
| 提出者≠ | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) |
| 类型 | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies. | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|