方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较扎根理论× | 比较案例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提出者≠ | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 别名 | cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|