方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较解释性研究× | 比较案例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 研究设计 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1843 (Mill); contemporary social-science formalisation 1971–1987 | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提出者≠ | John Stuart Mill (methods of agreement and difference, 1843); formalised in social science by Arend Lijphart and Charles Ragin | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 类型≠ | Observational explanatory research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press. ISBN: 978-0520063167 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 别名 | comparative explanation, explanatory comparative design, cross-case explanatory research, comparative causal analysis | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative explanatory research is an observational design that systematically examines two or more groups, nations, organisations, or time points in order to explain why differences in outcomes occur. Rather than merely describing variation, it seeks causal or contributing mechanisms by holding some conditions constant while contrasting others — drawing on Mill's classical methods of agreement and difference. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|