方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较文件分析× | 比较案例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | Mid-to-late 20th century; consolidated as explicit qualitative method by 2000s | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提出者≠ | Rooted in historical and social science documentary methods; systematised by scholars such as Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 别名 | comparative documentary analysis, cross-document analysis, comparative textual analysis, comparative archival analysis | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative document analysis is a qualitative research design that systematically examines two or more documents — or document sets — side by side to identify similarities, differences, patterns, and contradictions across contexts, institutions, time periods, or jurisdictions. Drawing on document analysis as a primary method, the comparative dimension adds analytical leverage by allowing the researcher to ask not just what a document says, but how and why it differs from comparable documents elsewhere. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|