方法对比

	比较法学理论研究	案例法分析
领域	田野方法	田野方法
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	19th century origins; modern systematic form 1960s–1998	Medieval English common law; academic formalisation 19th–20th century
提出者	Rooted in classical comparative law (Anselm von Feuerbach, early 19th c.); systematised by Zweigert & Kötz (1998)	Common law tradition (England); systematised in Anglo-American jurisprudence
类型	Qualitative legal research design	Qualitative legal research method
开创性文献	Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd ed., T. Weir, Trans.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198268598	Hutchinson, T. (2010). Researching and Writing in Law (3rd ed.). Thomson Reuters. ISBN: 9780455227689
别名	comparative-doctrinal method, cross-jurisdictional doctrinal analysis, comparative black-letter law research, CDLR	judicial decision analysis, legal case analysis, jurisprudential analysis, case-based legal research
相关	6	6
摘要	Comparative doctrinal legal research systematically identifies, expounds, and compares the legal rules, principles, and doctrines governing the same problem across two or more jurisdictions. It combines the internal rigour of doctrinal analysis — mapping the authoritative sources of a single legal system — with the external perspective of comparative law, asking whether different legal systems solve the same social problem in similar or divergent ways and why.	Case law analysis is a systematic method for examining judicial decisions to identify binding legal rules, evolving doctrines, and interpretive trends. Rooted in the common law tradition of stare decisis, it requires the researcher to locate the ratio decidendi — the binding reasoning — of each decision, distinguish it from obiter dicta, and trace how that reasoning has been applied, distinguished, or overruled across subsequent cases. The method is fundamental to legal scholarship, litigation strategy, and law reform research.