方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较话语分析× | 批判性话语分析 (CDA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–1990s (established as comparative practice through the 1990s) | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) |
| 提出者≠ | Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative comparative research approach | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman. ISBN: 978-0582219526 | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ |
| 别名 | CDA comparative, cross-context discourse analysis, comparative text analysis, multi-site discourse analysis | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative discourse analysis examines how language constructs meaning, identity, and power by systematically contrasting texts or speech acts drawn from at least two distinct contexts, groups, time periods, or institutions. By holding analytical categories constant across cases, it reveals how discursive patterns diverge or converge, producing insights that single-context discourse analysis cannot generate. | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|