方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较对话分析× | 话语分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1974 (CA foundation); comparative applications from 1980s–1990s | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提出者≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundation); comparative extension developed across the field from the 1980s onward | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative micro-analytic research design | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | comparative CA, cross-contextual conversation analysis, comparative interactional analysis, comparative talk-in-interaction | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 3 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative Conversation Analysis (comparative CA) applies the rigorous micro-analytic methods of Conversation Analysis across two or more contrasting interactional settings, languages, cultures, or participant groups. It examines how the sequential organisation of talk — turn-taking, repair, adjacency pairs, and action formation — varies or remains stable across contexts, producing cross-contextual evidence about the architecture of human interaction. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|