方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较建构主义扎根理论× | 比较案例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s (Charmaz 2000; extended comparatively through 2006–2014) | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提出者≠ | Kathy Charmaz (constructivist strand); comparative application developed in qualitative methodology literature | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973133 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 别名 | Comparative CGT, cross-group constructivist grounded theory, comparative Charmaz grounded theory, multi-site constructivist grounded theory | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative Constructivist Grounded Theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist strand of grounded theory with an explicit comparative design, deliberately collecting and analyzing data from two or more groups, settings, or time points to build a theory that accounts for variation and similarity across contexts. The constructivist perspective treats categories and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants rather than discovered objectively from data. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|