ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

比较经典扎根理论×扎根理论×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1967 (classic GT); comparative application formalised 1970s–1990s1967
提出者Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); comparative design extended by GlaserBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
类型Qualitative theory-building designMethod
开创性文献Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
别名Glaserian comparative grounded theory, classic GT comparative design, comparative CGT, multi-site classic grounded theoryGT, Grounded Theory Approach
相关63
摘要Comparative classic grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies Glaser and Strauss's original Glaserian grounded theory procedures across two or more deliberately selected comparison groups, settings, or time points. The constant comparative method — the analytical engine of classic GT — is extended systematically across sites so that the emerging substantive theory accounts for variation in the phenomenon across different contexts, populations, or conditions.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Comparative classic grounded theory · Grounded Theory. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare