方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较经典扎根理论× | 经典扎根理论× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1967 (classic GT); comparative application formalised 1970s–1990s | 1967 |
| 提出者≠ | Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); comparative design extended by Glaser | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative theory-building design | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| 别名 | Glaserian comparative grounded theory, classic GT comparative design, comparative CGT, multi-site classic grounded theory | Glaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GT |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative classic grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies Glaser and Strauss's original Glaserian grounded theory procedures across two or more deliberately selected comparison groups, settings, or time points. The constant comparative method — the analytical engine of classic GT — is extended systematically across sites so that the emerging substantive theory accounts for variation in the phenomenon across different contexts, populations, or conditions. | Classic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|