方法对比

	比较判例法分析	法律内容分析
领域	田野方法	田野方法
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	Late 19th–20th century (systematic comparative law from ~1900; case-focused comparative methodology consolidated ~1970s–1990s)	1940s–1970s (applied systematically to legal texts)
提出者	Comparative law tradition (Zweigert, Kötz, MacCormick, Summers and others)	Interdisciplinary; foundational content analysis by Harold Lasswell (1940s); applied to legal texts by empirical legal scholars from the 1970s onward
类型	Qualitative legal research method	Systematic qualitative-quantitative text analysis
开创性文献	MacCormick, D. N., & Summers, R. S. (Eds.). (1991). Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study. Dartmouth. ISBN: 978-1855210264	Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761915454
别名	cross-jurisdictional case analysis, comparative judicial analysis, transnational case law comparison, CCLA	LCA, legal text analysis, jurimetric content analysis, statutory content analysis
相关	6	6
摘要	Comparative case law analysis is a qualitative legal research method that systematically examines and contrasts judicial decisions from two or more legal systems or jurisdictions. By placing rulings side by side, the method identifies convergences, divergences, and the underlying legal reasoning that shapes how courts address similar legal questions across different national or regional contexts.	Legal content analysis applies the systematic procedures of content analysis to legal texts — statutes, regulations, judicial opinions, treaties, and legal commentaries — in order to identify patterns, themes, and trends across a corpus of legal material. It bridges qualitative legal scholarship and quantitative social-science methods, enabling researchers to draw reproducible, evidence-based conclusions about how law is written, applied, or has changed over time.