方法对比

	比较判例法分析	比较法学理论研究
领域	田野方法	田野方法
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	Late 19th–20th century (systematic comparative law from ~1900; case-focused comparative methodology consolidated ~1970s–1990s)	19th century origins; modern systematic form 1960s–1998
提出者	Comparative law tradition (Zweigert, Kötz, MacCormick, Summers and others)	Rooted in classical comparative law (Anselm von Feuerbach, early 19th c.); systematised by Zweigert & Kötz (1998)
类型	Qualitative legal research method	Qualitative legal research design
开创性文献	MacCormick, D. N., & Summers, R. S. (Eds.). (1991). Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study. Dartmouth. ISBN: 978-1855210264	Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd ed., T. Weir, Trans.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198268598
别名	cross-jurisdictional case analysis, comparative judicial analysis, transnational case law comparison, CCLA	comparative-doctrinal method, cross-jurisdictional doctrinal analysis, comparative black-letter law research, CDLR
相关	6	6
摘要	Comparative case law analysis is a qualitative legal research method that systematically examines and contrasts judicial decisions from two or more legal systems or jurisdictions. By placing rulings side by side, the method identifies convergences, divergences, and the underlying legal reasoning that shapes how courts address similar legal questions across different national or regional contexts.	Comparative doctrinal legal research systematically identifies, expounds, and compares the legal rules, principles, and doctrines governing the same problem across two or more jurisdictions. It combines the internal rigour of doctrinal analysis — mapping the authoritative sources of a single legal system — with the external perspective of comparative law, asking whether different legal systems solve the same social problem in similar or divergent ways and why.