方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比较式自主民族志× | 比较人种志× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~2013 | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) |
| 提出者≠ | Hayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & Hernandez | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948 | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | collaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAE | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Comparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth. | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|