ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

社群检测×Ideal Point Estimation×
领域网络分析Political Science
方法族Process / pipelineLatent structure
起源年份2002–2019 (algorithm family)2004
提出者Louvain: Blondel et al. (2008); Leiden: Traag et al. (2019); Girvan-Newman: Girvan & Newman (2002); Infomap: Rosvall & Bergstrom (2008)Clinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition)
类型Graph-partitioning / clustering algorithm familyLatent-variable spatial model of binary choice data
开创性文献Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10), P10008. DOI ↗Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗
别名graph clustering, network partitioning, Topluluk Tespiti (Louvain, Girvan-Newman, Leiden)Ideal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal points
相关54
摘要Community detection is a family of graph-partitioning algorithms that discover densely connected sub-groups — communities — within a network. First formalised through the modularity measure by Girvan and Newman (2002), the field advanced rapidly with the Louvain method (Blondel et al., 2008), the Leiden refinement (Traag et al., 2019), and the information-theoretic Infomap approach. All variants answer the same question: which nodes cluster together more tightly among themselves than with the rest of the network?Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Community Detection · Ideal Point Estimation. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare