方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| CollaboRATE 共同决策量表× | 决策冲突量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 以患者为中心的护理 | 以患者为中心的护理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2013 | 1995 |
| 提出者≠ | Glyn Elwyn | Annette O'Connor |
| 类型 | Patient-reported | Patient-reported |
| 开创性文献≠ | Elwyn, G., Barr, P. J., Grande, S. W., Thompson, R., Walsh, T., & Ozanne, E. M. (2013). Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(1), 102-107. DOI ↗ | O'Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25-30. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | Collaborative Therapeutic Engagement Scale | DCS-16, Decisional Conflict Inventory |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | CollaboRATE is a three-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess shared decision making (SDM) quality in clinical consultations. Developed by Glyn Elwyn and colleagues in 2013, it measures the degree to which clinicians involve patients in decisions about their care through simple, actionable items that are easy to administer and interpret. The scale has become a standard benchmark for evaluating SDM implementation in healthcare systems. | The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a 16-item self-reported outcome measure that quantifies the degree of uncertainty, value ambivalence, and decision distress experienced by patients facing healthcare choices. Developed by Annette O'Connor in 1995, the DCS assesses five core domains: personal uncertainty, understanding of options and outcomes, clarity of personal values, perceived social support, and confidence in making the decision. It has become the gold standard for measuring decisional conflict in healthcare research and clinical trials of decision support interventions. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|