方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| CollaboRATE 共同决策量表× | 控制偏好量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 以患者为中心的护理 | 以患者为中心的护理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2013 | 1997 |
| 提出者≠ | Glyn Elwyn | Lois Degner |
| 类型 | Patient-reported | Patient-reported |
| 开创性文献≠ | Elwyn, G., Barr, P. J., Grande, S. W., Thompson, R., Walsh, T., & Ozanne, E. M. (2013). Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(1), 102-107. DOI ↗ | Degner, L. F., Sloan, J. A., & Venkatesh, P. (1997). The Control Preferences Scale. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 29(3), 21-43. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | Collaborative Therapeutic Engagement Scale | Desired Role in Decision Making, Decision Role Preference |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | CollaboRATE is a three-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess shared decision making (SDM) quality in clinical consultations. Developed by Glyn Elwyn and colleagues in 2013, it measures the degree to which clinicians involve patients in decisions about their care through simple, actionable items that are easy to administer and interpret. The scale has become a standard benchmark for evaluating SDM implementation in healthcare systems. | The Control Preferences Scale (CPS) is a five-item measure that assesses a patient's preferred role in healthcare decision making, ranging from a passive (physician-directed) to active (patient-directed) or shared approach. Developed by Lois Degner and colleagues in 1997, the CPS measures the degree of control patients wish to exercise in treatment decisions: whether they prefer to leave decisions to the clinician, collaborate with the clinician, or make the final decision themselves. The scale is widely used to understand patient preferences for decision-making involvement and to evaluate the alignment between preferred and actual roles. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|