ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

协作研究心理治疗评定量表×治疗联盟量表×
领域心理治疗研究心理治疗研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19881997
提出者Irene Elkin, Barbara F. ShawPoul J. Raue, Marvin R. Goldfried
类型Observer-ratedTherapist/Client-rated
开创性文献Waltz, J., Addis, M. E., Koerner, K., & Jacobson, N. S. (1993). Testing the integrity of a psychotherapy protocol: Assessment of adherence and competence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 620–630. DOI ↗Raue, P. J., Goldfried, M. R., & Barkham, M. (1997). The therapeutic alliance in psychodynamic-interpersonal and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(4), 582–587. DOI ↗
别名CSPRS, Psychotherapy Rating ScaleTHAS, TAS, Therapeutic Working Alliance Scale
相关44
摘要The Collaborative Study Psychotherapy Rating Scale (CSPRS) is an observer-rated measure of therapist adherence to a psychotherapy protocol and general competence in delivering the intervention. Developed for the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program, the CSPRS uses audiotape or videotape review to assess whether therapists follow intended treatment protocols and execute techniques skillfully. It is the gold standard instrument for fidelity and competence measurement in psychotherapy research and training.The Therapeutic Alliance Scale (THAS) is a clinician-rated measure of the quality of the therapeutic relationship and working alliance, developed by Raue, Goldfried, and Barkham. Distinct from client-rated measures like the Working Alliance Inventory, the THAS captures the therapist's perception of goal alignment, task agreement, and emotional bond. It is used primarily in research to examine alliance from the therapist perspective and to understand therapist–client congruence in alliance perception.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Collaborative Study Psychotherapy Rating Scale · Therapeutic Alliance Scale. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare