方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 粗化精确匹配 (CEM)× | 倾向得分加权法 (PSW / IPW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 2011-2012 | 1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator) |
| 提出者≠ | Iacus, King, & Porro | Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting) |
| 类型≠ | Matching / causal inference | Causal inference / reweighting |
| 开创性文献≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | CEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching | PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model. | Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003). |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|