ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Coalition Formation Analysis×Spatial Voting Model×
领域Political EconomyPolitical Science
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19621957
提出者William Riker; Michael Laver & Norman SchofieldHarold Hotelling, Duncan Black & Anthony Downs
类型Formal theory of coalition selectionFormal model of electoral and legislative choice
开创性文献Riker, W. H. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. Yale University Press. ISBN: 9780300001754Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper & Row. ISBN: 9780060417505
别名Minimal Winning Coalition Theory, Riker Size Principle, Coalition Theory, Government Coalition AnalysisSpatial Theory of Voting, Downsian Model, Proximity Voting Model, Median Voter Model
相关44
摘要Coalition formation analysis is the formal study of which subset of parties will combine to form a governing or decision-making coalition when no single party commands a majority. William Riker's 1962 The Theory of Political Coalitions supplied the foundational logic: under pure office-seeking, rational politicians form minimal winning coalitions and, by the size principle, the smallest winning coalition possible, so that the spoils of office are divided among as few partners as necessary. Michael Laver and Norman Schofield's 1990 Multiparty Government enriched this with policy-seeking motives, showing that coalitions also tend to be ideologically connected. The framework predicts coalition membership from seat shares and party positions.The spatial voting model represents voters and political alternatives as points in a common geometric policy space and assumes that each voter supports the alternative nearest to their own ideal point. Rooted in Hotelling's location theory, Duncan Black's 1948 single-peakedness result, and Anthony Downs's 1957 economic theory of democracy, the model yields two foundational results: the median voter theorem, which identifies the equilibrium policy in one dimension, and the Downsian prediction that two vote-seeking parties converge toward the center. It is the workhorse formalism behind modern empirical estimation of political positions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Coalition Formation Analysis · Spatial Voting Model. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare