ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

共词分析×范围界定审查×
领域科学计量学科学计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19832005
提出者Michel Callon, Jean-Pierre Courtial, and colleaguesHilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
类型Scientometric network analysis techniqueEvidence synthesis review design
开创性文献Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. DOI ↗Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗
别名keyword co-occurrence analysis, co-word mapping, keyword co-word network, CWAscoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
相关66
摘要Co-word analysis is a scientometric technique that quantifies how often pairs of keywords, subject terms, or title words appear together across a corpus of publications. By treating simultaneous occurrence as a proxy for conceptual relatedness, it constructs networks and clusters that reveal the intellectual structure, dominant themes, and emerging sub-fields of a research domain.A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Co-word Analysis · Scoping Review. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare