方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 共词分析× | 科学制图× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 科学计量学 | 文献计量学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1983 | 2000s |
| 提出者≠ | Michel Callon, Jean-Pierre Courtial, and colleagues | Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others |
| 类型≠ | Scientometric network analysis technique | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. DOI ↗ | Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | keyword co-occurrence analysis, co-word mapping, keyword co-word network, CWA | knowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Co-word analysis is a scientometric technique that quantifies how often pairs of keywords, subject terms, or title words appear together across a corpus of publications. By treating simultaneous occurrence as a proxy for conceptual relatedness, it constructs networks and clusters that reveal the intellectual structure, dominant themes, and emerging sub-fields of a research domain. | Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|