ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Co-Production Analysis×Sociotechnical Imaginaries Analysis×
领域Science Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20042009
提出者Sheila JasanoffSheila Jasanoff & Sang-Hyun Kim
类型Interpretive analytic framework (idiom) in science and technology studiesQualitative interpretive and comparative method
开创性文献Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Routledge. ISBN: 9780415403290Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119-146. DOI ↗
别名Co-production idiom, Co-productionist analysis, Knowledge and social order analysisSociotechnical imaginary analysis, Imaginaries of science and technology, Visions of desirable futures analysis
相关44
摘要Co-production analysis applies the 'idiom of co-production' developed by Sheila Jasanoff: the claim that the ways we know the world are inseparable from the ways we choose to live in it. Scientific knowledge and social order are not produced in separate spheres that later interact; they are produced together. Co-production analysis traces this simultaneous making of natural and social facts—how a new way of knowing nature is bound up with new identities, institutions, discourses, and representations that together stabilise both knowledge and political order.Sociotechnical imaginaries analysis studies the collectively held, institutionally stabilised, and publicly performed visions of desirable futures that societies attach to science and technology. Introduced by Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim in their 2009 comparison of nuclear power in the United States and South Korea, the concept treats imaginaries as more than rhetoric: they are co-produced with the material and political order, shaping how technologies are designed, governed, and lived. The method reconstructs these visions from public discourse, traces how they become embedded in institutions and policy, and compares how the same technology animates different imaginaries across nations or eras.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Co-Production Analysis · Sociotechnical Imaginaries Analysis. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare