ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

共著网络分析×文献耦合分析×
领域文献计量学文献计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20011963
提出者Mark E. J. Newman and othersMelvin M. Kessler
类型MethodMethod
开创性文献Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409. DOI ↗Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(3), 123–131. DOI ↗
别名collaboration network, authorship network, research collaboration mappingdocument coupling, bibliographic similarity
相关45
摘要Co-authorship network analysis is a method that maps research collaboration patterns by treating authors as nodes and co-authored papers as edges in a network graph. The structure, density, and centrality patterns of this network reveal how researchers connect, collaborate across institutions and disciplines, and form research communities. Pioneered formally by Newman (2001), co-authorship analysis provides quantitative insights into the social fabric of science, revealing collaboration patterns, identifying scientific leaders, and detecting institutional or disciplinary boundaries.Bibliographic coupling is a method that identifies intellectual relationships between documents by measuring their shared references. Two papers are considered 'coupled' when they cite the same sources, indicating they address related research questions or draw from the same conceptual foundations. Introduced by Kessler in 1963, this approach enables researchers to map knowledge domains and discover thematically similar publications without relying on subject cataloging or keywords.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Co-Authorship Network Analysis · Bibliographic Coupling. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare