ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

经典扎根理论×叙事分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19671967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook)
提出者Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. StraussCatherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967)
类型Qualitative research methodQualitative interpretive method
开创性文献Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗
别名Glaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GTnarrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis)
相关66
摘要Classic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks.Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Classic Grounded Theory · Narrative Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare