ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

经典扎根理论×行动研究×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19671946
提出者Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. StraussKurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury
类型Qualitative research methodMethod
开创性文献Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗
别名Glaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GTParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry
相关61
摘要Classic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Classic Grounded Theory · Action Research. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare