ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Citizens' Jury Method×Participatory Evaluation×
领域Public PolicyPublic Policy
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19861998
提出者Ned Crosby (Jefferson Center); Peter Dienel developed the parallel PlanungszelleJ. Bradley Cousins & Elizabeth Whitmore
类型Deliberative mini-public methodCollaborative, stakeholder-engaged evaluation approach
开创性文献Crosby, N., Kelly, J. M., & Schaefer, P. (1986). Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 46(2), 170–178. DOI ↗Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1998(80), 5–23. DOI ↗
别名Citizens Jury, Citizen Panel, Citizens' PanelCollaborative Evaluation, Stakeholder-Based Evaluation, Practical Participatory Evaluation
相关44
摘要A citizens' jury is a deliberative method that convenes a small, demographically representative panel of randomly selected citizens to consider a policy question in depth and produce reasoned recommendations. Modelled loosely on the trial jury, it gives ordinary people time, balanced information, expert witnesses and skilled facilitation so they can deliberate and reach a considered judgement on behalf of the wider public. Developed in the United States by Ned Crosby and his Jefferson Center, with a parallel German tradition (the Planungszelle) created by Peter Dienel, it is a leading form of deliberative 'mini-public'.Participatory evaluation is a family of approaches in which stakeholders — program staff, beneficiaries, community members — are engaged as active partners in conducting the evaluation rather than as passive subjects of it. In their influential 1998 framing, J. Bradley Cousins and Elizabeth Whitmore distinguished two streams: practical participatory evaluation, oriented to improving program decisions and use, and transformative participatory evaluation, oriented to empowerment and social justice. What unites them is shared control of the inquiry, but they vary along dimensions of who participates, how much control they hold, and how deeply they are involved.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Citizens' Jury Method · Participatory Evaluation. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare