ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

CHA₂DS₂-VASc 评分×APACHE II评分×
领域临床评估临床评估
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20101985
提出者Gregory Y. H. Lip, Robby Nieuwlaat, et al.William A. Knaus, et al.
类型Atrial fibrillation stroke risk stratificationICU severity and mortality prediction
开创性文献Lip, G. Y., Nieuwlaat, R., Pisters, R., Lane, D. A., & Crijns, H. J. (2010). Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest, 137(2), 263-272. DOI ↗Knaus, W. A., Draper, E. A., Wagner, D. P., & Zimmerman, J. E. (1985). APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Critical Care Medicine, 13(10), 818-829. DOI ↗
别名CHA2DS2VASc, Atrial fibrillation stroke riskAPACHE-II, APACHE2
相关33
摘要The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, developed by Lip, Nieuwlaat, and colleagues in 2010, is a 9-point risk stratification tool for predicting annual stroke and systemic thromboembolism risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. It is the recommended score by major cardiology guidelines for guiding anticoagulation decisions.The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, introduced by Knaus et al. in 1985, is a 71-point severity of illness classification system for critically ill patients. It combines acute physiological parameters, age, and chronic health status to predict intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, facilitating patient risk stratification and research standardization.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score · APACHE II Score. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare