ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

因果比较研究×调查研究×
领域研究设计研究设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1964Late 19th century; methodologically systematised 1940s–1960s
提出者Fred N. KerlingerFrancis Galton, Charles Booth, and early social statisticians; systematised by Paul Lazarsfeld and colleagues at Columbia in the 1940s
类型Non-experimental quantitative research designQuantitative (and mixed) non-experimental design
开创性文献Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. link ↗Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey Research Methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1452259000
别名ex post facto research, causal-comparative design, retrospective causal study, CCRsurvey methodology, questionnaire research, survey design, survey study
相关34
摘要Causal-comparative research is a non-experimental quantitative design in which the researcher compares two or more groups that already differ on an independent variable — one that was not manipulated — to investigate possible causes or consequences of that difference. Because group membership is pre-existing rather than randomly assigned, the design can suggest causal relationships but cannot establish them with the certainty of a true experiment. It is widely used in education, psychology, and social sciences when experimental manipulation is impractical or unethical.Survey research is a quantitative (and sometimes mixed-methods) design in which a researcher collects standardised self-report data from a sample drawn from a defined population, using a questionnaire or structured interview. It is the dominant non-experimental strategy for describing population characteristics, estimating prevalence, mapping attitude distributions, and testing bivariate or multivariate associations across social, behavioural, and health sciences.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Causal-Comparative Research · Survey Research. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare