方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| CASP 随机对照试验清单× | PRISMA清单：系统评价和荟萃分析报告标准× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究方法论 | 研究方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1993 (updated through 2023) | 2021 (original 2009) |
| 提出者≠ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) | Page et al. (PRISMA Group) |
| 类型≠ | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment | Systematic review author reporting checklist |
| 开创性文献≠ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ | Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | CASP-RCT, CASP | PRISMA, PRISMA 2020 |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. | PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is a 27-item evidence-based checklist published in 2021 (updated from 2009) to standardize reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Endorsed by over 500 journals, PRISMA is the international standard for evidence synthesis reporting, used across healthcare, psychology, education, and social sciences to ensure transparency and reproducibility. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|