ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Candidate Evaluation Model×党派认同量表×
领域政治心理学政治心理学
方法族Latent structureProcess / pipeline
起源年份19951960
提出者Milton Lodge, Marco Steenbergen & Donald KinderAngus Campbell et al.
类型Latent evaluation modelSelf-report
开创性文献Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 309-326. DOI ↗Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
别名Impression-Driven Evaluation Model, Online Processing Model, Candidate Trait Evaluation ModelPAS, Party Identification, Partisan Strength
相关43
摘要A candidate evaluation model represents how voters form overall assessments of political candidates as a latent function of perceived traits (competence, leadership, integrity, empathy), partisanship, issue proximity, and affect. It spans the trait-based factor models of Kinder et al. (1980) and the online-processing tally model of Lodge, Steenbergen and Brau (1995), which describes evaluation as a running summary updated as information arrives.The Partisan Identity Scale measures strength and direction of psychological attachment to a political party, encompassing both party preference and emotional party identification. Foundational since Campbell et al.'s American Voter (1960), the measure distinguishes party affiliation (which party one is registered with) from party identification (psychological identity with a party as a social group). Partisan identity is among the strongest predictors of voting behavior, political attitudes, and interpretation of political information, functioning as a 'perceptual filter' through which voters process news.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Candidate Evaluation Model · Partisan Identity Scale. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare